
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leaving a &#8220;Passive Aggressive&#8221; relationship &#8211; a local Hannity/Colmes Story&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citizenwausau.com/mercutio/2008/11/29/21/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citizenwausau.com/mercutio/2008/11/29/21/</link>
	<description>Sometimes the dream is a nightmare… mostly anarcho stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 16:46:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mercutio</title>
		<link>http://citizenwausau.com/mercutio/2008/11/29/21/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>mercutio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizenwausau.com/mercutio/2008/11/29/21/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Very sorry Tom King for getting you name wrong.  It was a real brain fart on my part.  Very sorry.

The AM55 WSAU blogged and linked to this blog on this subject.  I am returning the favor here:
http://wsau.com/StationFiles/Blog/News/

On the above linked blog Chris Conley operational manager of AM 55 mentioned “Of course, someone who listens to WSAU as much as this blogger would get Tom&#039;s name right.”  
He is right, I should have gotten it right.  My bad.  However I’ve been a listener long enough to remember that right after the war started Pat would call his “friend” Tom King a “traitor” on the air for not whole heartedly supporting the presidents illegal NSA spying.  I remember how shaken Tom was during the news break right after.  This is just one of many examples of the depths of the new version of Red Baiting tactics conservative talk commercial radio is willing to go to to throw some raw meat to their listeners for ratings.  

Lastly.  Yes thank you Tom King for sharing your thoughts.  Pleasantly surprised and impressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very sorry Tom King for getting you name wrong.  It was a real brain fart on my part.  Very sorry.</p>
<p>The AM55 WSAU blogged and linked to this blog on this subject.  I am returning the favor here:<br />
<a href="http://wsau.com/StationFiles/Blog/News/" rel="nofollow">http://wsau.com/StationFiles/Blog/News/</a></p>
<p>On the above linked blog Chris Conley operational manager of AM 55 mentioned “Of course, someone who listens to WSAU as much as this blogger would get Tom&#8217;s name right.”<br />
He is right, I should have gotten it right.  My bad.  However I’ve been a listener long enough to remember that right after the war started Pat would call his “friend” Tom King a “traitor” on the air for not whole heartedly supporting the presidents illegal NSA spying.  I remember how shaken Tom was during the news break right after.  This is just one of many examples of the depths of the new version of Red Baiting tactics conservative talk commercial radio is willing to go to to throw some raw meat to their listeners for ratings.  </p>
<p>Lastly.  Yes thank you Tom King for sharing your thoughts.  Pleasantly surprised and impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dino Corvino</title>
		<link>http://citizenwausau.com/mercutio/2008/11/29/21/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Dino Corvino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 17:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizenwausau.com/mercutio/2008/11/29/21/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Way to go Tom King.

I think you are making assumptions about your listeners understanding the bad stuff, but I will respuectfully disagree.



But, thank you for showing up here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to go Tom King.</p>
<p>I think you are making assumptions about your listeners understanding the bad stuff, but I will respuectfully disagree.</p>
<p>But, thank you for showing up here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomking</title>
		<link>http://citizenwausau.com/mercutio/2008/11/29/21/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>tomking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 09:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizenwausau.com/mercutio/2008/11/29/21/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Geez, the least you could do is get my name right. To paraphrase Tim Rice and Andrew Lloyd Webber &quot;Don&#039;t Cry for Me Mercutio....our radio show is one of the most popular in the area and certainly wouldn&#039;t be as entertaining if we agreed on everything. Most listeners know when callers or one of us is speaking nonsense. It is also my understanding that Alan Colmes left his show of his own accord....as he put it &quot;we have a Democratic President, House and Senate, my work here is done. Every time that my views are insulted with little but Dittohead
talking points it says alot more aboutthe speaker than it does about me. So let the Rush wannabes grind their teeth in frustration and belittle President Obama if they must...it&#039;s only because their agenda was so throughly repudiated on November 4th

Tom King
WSAU Radio

P.S....Thanks for the kind words about my sports broadcasts....they&#039;re the most fun part of my day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geez, the least you could do is get my name right. To paraphrase Tim Rice and Andrew Lloyd Webber &#8220;Don&#8217;t Cry for Me Mercutio&#8230;.our radio show is one of the most popular in the area and certainly wouldn&#8217;t be as entertaining if we agreed on everything. Most listeners know when callers or one of us is speaking nonsense. It is also my understanding that Alan Colmes left his show of his own accord&#8230;.as he put it &#8220;we have a Democratic President, House and Senate, my work here is done. Every time that my views are insulted with little but Dittohead<br />
talking points it says alot more aboutthe speaker than it does about me. So let the Rush wannabes grind their teeth in frustration and belittle President Obama if they must&#8230;it&#8217;s only because their agenda was so throughly repudiated on November 4th</p>
<p>Tom King<br />
WSAU Radio</p>
<p>P.S&#8230;.Thanks for the kind words about my sports broadcasts&#8230;.they&#8217;re the most fun part of my day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mercutio</title>
		<link>http://citizenwausau.com/mercutio/2008/11/29/21/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>mercutio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizenwausau.com/mercutio/2008/11/29/21/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Funny.

I just got an e-mail from a friend that stated they thought my article itself was “passive aggressive.”  

Ok then, let me make my self perfectly clear.  I think Rush, Hannity and Pat Snyder are bullies and they appeal only to the lowest common denominator in our society.  They propagandize fear and vilify the “other.”  What they do is easy, and would never be involved in a real debate for fear they would not have the radio station’s mute button to protect them.

And though their “partners” act like they are in an abusive relationship that they can’t leave, the fact is that they could leave and choose to enable this behavior for the sake of a paycheck.  

I hope this make’s my feelings clear.

Mercutio</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny.</p>
<p>I just got an e-mail from a friend that stated they thought my article itself was “passive aggressive.”  </p>
<p>Ok then, let me make my self perfectly clear.  I think Rush, Hannity and Pat Snyder are bullies and they appeal only to the lowest common denominator in our society.  They propagandize fear and vilify the “other.”  What they do is easy, and would never be involved in a real debate for fear they would not have the radio station’s mute button to protect them.</p>
<p>And though their “partners” act like they are in an abusive relationship that they can’t leave, the fact is that they could leave and choose to enable this behavior for the sake of a paycheck.  </p>
<p>I hope this make’s my feelings clear.</p>
<p>Mercutio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Buzz &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Handc.Jpg Leaving a “Passive Aggressive” Relationship - a Local &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://citizenwausau.com/mercutio/2008/11/29/21/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>The Buzz &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Handc.Jpg Leaving a “Passive Aggressive” Relationship - a Local &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizenwausau.com/mercutio/2008/11/29/21/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>[...] Leaving a “Passive Aggressive” relationship - A local Hannity / Colmes Story. According to Wikapidia Passive Aggressive is “a personality disorder said to be marked by a pervasive pattern of negative attitudes and passive, &#8230;[Continue Reading] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Leaving a “Passive Aggressive” relationship &#8211; A local Hannity / Colmes Story. According to Wikapidia Passive Aggressive is “a personality disorder said to be marked by a pervasive pattern of negative attitudes and passive, &#8230;[Continue Reading] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
